Interní Med. 2009; 11(9): 384-388
In spite of proven efficacy in the prevention of atherothrombotic vascular events, aspirin is not able to prevent thrombosis in all patients.
“Aspirin resistance” is not a precise descriptor, the term is used in clinical sense (as a failure to prevent a thrombotic complication), as
well as in laboratory sense (impossibility to prove the effect of aspirin by some laboratory assay). Diagnostic methods for aspirin resistance
are poorly standardized, there are number of assays that do not correlate well with each other and only some of them have been
tested for clinical relevance. Because of heterogeneous methodology, the prevalence of aspirin resistance is reported in a wide range;
according to recent metaanalysis the mean prevalence is 24 %. Numerous mechanisms of aspirin resistance have been suggested but in
the real world the most often mechanism is probably non-compliance and interaction with non-steroidal antiiflammatory drugs. Many
clinical studies have proven the association of aspirin resistance with the increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, there is no
evidence-based management able to reduce this risk; higher aspirin dose or its replacement or combination with other antiplatelet
agent should be considered. At present, routine evaluation of aspirin resistance is not recommended.
Published: October 1, 2009 Show citation