Interní Med. 2012; 14(2): 59-63

Treatment options for hypertension in patients with ischaemic heart disease

prof.MUDr.Jindřich ©pinar, CSc., FESC1, prof.MUDr.Jiří Vítovec, CSc., FESC2
1 Interní kardiologická klinika FN Brno a LF MU Brno
2 I. interní kardioangiologická klinika FN u sv. Anny a LF MU Brno

Hypertension is one of the major risk factors for ischaemic heart disease with adequate blood pressure control being the cornerstone of

primary as well as secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease. In terms of primary prevention, it is recommended to control blood

pressure effectively, i.e. to maintain the pressure below 140/90 mm Hg; for patients in secondary prevention, it has been recommended

to keep it below 130/85 mm Hg. The mainstay of hypertension management in patients with ischaemic heart disease is the use of ACE

inhibitors and/or AII antagonists with beta blockers.

Epidemiological data show an increase in cardiovascular mortality starting from a pressure of 110/70 mm Hg. In 2003, the Joint National

Committee published the Seventh Report (JNC 7) which recommended reducing blood pressure in diabetic patients below 130/80 mm Hg

and this has been adopted by most national societies, including the European and Czech 2007 Guidelines that apply the target level also

to patients with ischaemic heart disease, i.e. patients after myocardial infarction and those with stable and unstable angina pectoris. It

is not noted whether the recommended level is also applicable in patients with heart failure of ischaemic aetiology; nevertheless, these

patients are not explicitly excluded.

Data from the INVEST and ACCORD trials, however, have led to a reappraisal of these strict recommendations and the currently recommended

level of blood pressure in secondary prevention is high-normal blood pressure, i.e. 130–139 mm Hg/80–89 mm Hg.

Studies with beta blockers have proved that heart rate reduction results in improved patient prognosis. This hypothesis was definitively confirmed

by the BEAUTIFUL and SHIFT trials of ivabradine. The recommended heart rate for patients in secondary prevention is 50–70 bpm.

Keywords: hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, ACE inhibitors, sartans, beta blockers

Published: February 22, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©pinar J, Vítovec J. Treatment options for hypertension in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Interní Med. 2012;14(2):59-63.
Download citation

References

  1. ©pinar, J, Vítovec J, et al. Ischemická choroba srdeční. Praha, Grada Publishing 2003, 364 s.
  2. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Caruthers SG, et al. Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering and low dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized trial. Lancet 1998; 351: 1755-1762. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Task Force Members 2007. Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertension 2007; 25: 1105-1187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Widimský J. jr., Cífková R, ©pinat J, et al. Doporučení diagnostických a léčebných postupů arteriální hypertenze - verze 2007. Doporučení České společnosti pro hypertenzi. Cor et vasa 2008; 1: K3-23.
  5. Widimský J. jr., Cífková R, ©pinat J, et al. Doporučení diagnostických a léčebných postupů arteriální hypertenze - verze 2007. Doporučení České společnosti pro hypertenzi. Vnitřní lékařství 2008; 1: 101-118.
  6. Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei L, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of hypertension Task Force dokument. Journal of Hypertension 2009; 27(11): 2121-2158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Widimský J. Komentář k přehodnocení evropských doporučení léčby arteriální hypertenze. Cor et vasa 2010; 52(1-2): 75-79. Go to original source...
  8. ©pinar J, Souček M. Přehodnocení doporučení pro diagnostiku a léčbu hypertenze. Vnitřní lékařství 2010; 56(2): 157-161. Go to PubMed...
  9. Lechat P, Escolano S, Golmard JL, et al. Prognostic value of bisoprolol-induced hemodynamic effects in heart failure during the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS). Circulation 1997; 96: 2197-2205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lechat P, Hulot LS, Escolano S, et al. Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationship with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBIS II trial. Circulation 2001; 103: 1428-1433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Fox K, Ford I, Steg G, et al. Heart rate as a prognostic risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a subgroup analysis of a randomised cotrolled trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 817-821. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Fox K, Ford I, Steg G, et al. Ivabradin for patients with stable coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 807-816. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, et al. on behalf of the SHIFT investigators. Ivabradine outcomes in chronic heart silure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2010; 376: 875-885. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Internal Medicine for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.